When Editors don't do their job......

This is the place to discuss the episodes of the Comic Book Page podcast, the Comic Book Page website or pretty much anything else of interest to the Comic Book Page community...

Moderator: JohnMayo

BobBretall
Master Reviewer
Posts: 5522
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:44 pm

Post by BobBretall »

Koete wrote:Atomic Robo: Dogs of War #5. Page 4. "Material" misspelled as "materiel".
Materiel is actually correct, it is used in a military context all the time.

ma⋅té⋅ri⋅el
   /məˌtɪəriˈɛl/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [muh-teer-ee-el]
–noun
1. the aggregate of things used or needed in any business, undertaking, or operation (distinguished from personnel ).
2. Military. arms, ammunition, and equipment in general.
Koete
Reviewer
Posts: 246
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:30 pm
Contact:

Post by Koete »

:oops:
Image
Trev
Master Reviewer
Posts: 1233
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:15 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Post by Trev »

BobBretall wrote:
Koete wrote:Atomic Robo: Dogs of War #5. Page 4. "Material" misspelled as "materiel".
Materiel is actually correct, it is used in a military context all the time.

ma⋅té⋅ri⋅el
   /məˌtɪəriˈɛl/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [muh-teer-ee-el]
–noun
1. the aggregate of things used or needed in any business, undertaking, or operation (distinguished from personnel ).
2. Military. arms, ammunition, and equipment in general.
Nice! Thanks for the vocab lesson, Bob. I actually didn't have that one. Military terminology is a weak area for me.
BobBretall
Master Reviewer
Posts: 5522
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:44 pm

Post by BobBretall »

Trev wrote: Nice! Thanks for the vocab lesson, Bob. I actually didn't have that one. Military terminology is a weak area for me.
I don't have any actual time in the military, but I worked as a programmer & designer on SW defense contracts with the Navy, Army & Air Force for 13 years when I worked for TRW..... you pick up various bits of lingo working with the folks in uniform.
Skyhawke
Reviewer
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:38 pm

Post by Skyhawke »

I showed this post to my wife and her comment was it is just not the comic book editors but the publishing world as a whole has gotten much worse in catching grammar mistakes. She catches a lot of mistakes in the books she reads as well. She is an high school English teacher by the way.
Unknown Fanboy
Contributor
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:31 am

Post by Unknown Fanboy »

DCU Holiday Special:
5th page of the Huntress story

The word balloons are switched:
Helena is having a student help her, as punishment, in delivering some donations to a family and the Kid is actually saying Helena's 3 balloons worth of dialouge.

I was already having a hard time reading the story as is and this just took me further out of it
Image
User avatar
JohnMayo
Host/Owner
Posts: 3294
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 3:12 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by JohnMayo »

Unknown Fanboy wrote:DCU Holiday Special:
5th page of the Huntress story

The word balloons are switched:
Helena is having a student help her, as punishment, in delivering some donations to a family and the Kid is actually saying Helena's 3 balloons worth of dialouge.

I was already having a hard time reading the story as is and this just took me further out of it
I noticed the flipped word balloons when reading it for the Christmas 2008 Back Issue Spotlight episode but didn't think to mention it here. Thanks for doing so. This is the sort of error which really ought to get caught in the proof reading stage.
Comic Book Page: Website || Podcast || RSS || Episodes Archive
IanG
Special Reviewer
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 7:37 pm
Location: Boston

Post by IanG »

Station, Trade Paperback, pg 100, top of page, from Boom Studios

"220 Miles. Doesn't seem that far. Until you're look down."

I think it should be, "Until you're looking down."

I thought this was funny because this is also the big pull quote on the back of the trade where it's correct but inside it's a whoops. It's still a good trade nonetheless.
Skyhawke
Reviewer
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:38 pm

Post by Skyhawke »

A nice blog post by Mark Waid on the job of the editor.
neenjah
Reviewer
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:14 pm
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post by neenjah »

After seeing that and hearing you talk to Mark Waid I would love to hear you do an episode on the role of an editor. Maybe talk to Mark, Len Wein, Roy Thomas, or others.

The role of the inker would be interesting, too. Maybe some old school guys and someone new like Dan Parsons (Star Wars). Talk about brush VS Pen or digital.

Lin
Artist seeks fame and fortune by drawing funny!

www dot LinWorkman dot com
Skyhawke
Reviewer
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:38 pm

Post by Skyhawke »

There is a follow up discussion on Mark's blog on his messageboard where he talks a little more in length on how it was back in Schwartz's era as opposed to today

Comics Editor's Job
Koete
Reviewer
Posts: 246
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:30 pm
Contact:

Post by Koete »

This isn't so much a "when editors don't do their job", rather it's when an artist doesn't.

Image
BobBretall
Master Reviewer
Posts: 5522
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:44 pm

Post by BobBretall »

"after Ditko".... what a jag-off, at least know who you're swiping from.....
Skyhawke
Reviewer
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:38 pm

Post by Skyhawke »

Well before you get to harsh on the artist, a) you don't know if it was the editor that asked for that cover b) when so many artist don't give credit to who they are swiping it from, it actually nice to see someone give credit to the original artist.

I believe Steve Bryant mention he actually preferred artist that do this kind of cover to give credit in this matter and I would agree with him.
BobBretall
Master Reviewer
Posts: 5522
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:44 pm

Post by BobBretall »

Skyhawke wrote:Well before you get to harsh on the artist, a) you don't know if it was the editor that asked for that cover b) when so many artist don't give credit to who they are swiping it from, it actually nice to see someone give credit to the original artist.

I believe Steve Bryant mention he actually preferred artist that do this kind of cover to give credit in this matter and I would agree with him.
You misunderstand.

I don't have a problem with someone doing an "After..." cover and acknowledging the original artist, but he is crediting the WRONG original artist, that is what Chris & I were commenting on.

This is "After Romita, Sr.", NOT "After Ditko"

Thus my comment about at least knowing who you are swiping from.
Post Reply