![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
This will be as wordy and confused as usual... sorry.
I want to clarify its totally ok to be hard on Marvel for doing gimmicks!
I just think the critique on gimmicks should be evenly distributed. It isnt, since gimmicks usually dont work as well (or just as bad) for the competitors they are ignored, as you noticed about green lantern corps edge of oblivion #1. (unrelated I noticed the heavy drop on green lantern #48 for some reason... -20% ouch, whyy?). Its clearly working good in many cases for Marvel and puts the spotlight on them but others also do similar stuff almost as frequently.
Lets do a round of gimmick bashing at DC, the DKR#3 and coming of the supermen(i think?) sells high, gimmick events and #1s, DC You and DC rebirth lots of new #1s, flooding the comic book stands with double shipping titles noone was really asking for? Image is also guilty of releasing many new #1s of totally new properties, many exciting and good ones to be sure, but with a haltingly slow schedule they stumble.
I dont follow IDW or other smaller publishers but im sure ive seen restarts on X-0 manowar, Unity, ninjak, eternal warrior (sorry very unfamiliar territory here). The archie restart for that matter, high initial sales down to 20k sales now, totally ok and nothing to be ashamed of but still very low compared to first issues that were very high. Bloated early issue numbers anyone? For that matter, Walking Dead #150 anniversary gimmick, but you talked about that so...
Another matter, I think its a deliberate experiment by Marvel not having a flag-ship avenger or xmen book? The different titles have a slightly varied flavor and different characters but not one sticks out particularly. Reason for this just plain because they can? ANAD Avengers and Extraordinary XMen are the most flag-shippiest of the properties imo... its easier to choose to just read a flag-ship title, with no clear cut maybe you read more or less avenger/xmen titles?